When Art Meets Science is it Always Art?

The San Francisco Chronicle asks a fine question about the legitimacy of art meeting science as we ponder the image of an electrograph of a brass wire gauge in the year 1900:

Should we consider “Brought to Light: Photography and the Invisible,
1840-1900
” an art exhibition just because the San Francisco Museum of
Modern Art has organized it?


We argue that, yes, those images in the art exhibition are, indeed, art.

Unlike the Dynamic Painting “True Art fraud” — these images from antiquity are in situ. 

The wondrous images reveal the inner workings and intricacies of everyday objects that enlighten our current world with the insight from the past.

About David W. Boles

Publishes 14 blogs through BolesBlogs.com. Teaches via BolesUniversity.com. Publishes through BolesBooks.com. Lives at Boles.com.
This entry was posted in Science and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to When Art Meets Science is it Always Art?

  1. Dananjay Anandan says:

    Brilliant photographs, David! In their illumination of the how and what of things we find art.

  2. Hi Dananjay!
    Exactly! The art show finds the inner beauty in ordinary objects. It’s a sheer delight to see that sort of mindset alive in the late 1800′s! You certainly get the notion, “We’ve been here before!” when looking a the images.

Share Your Thoughts:

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s